greyias.livejournal.com ([identity profile] greyias.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] greyias 2008-11-24 06:38 pm (UTC)

But then there's more m-f friendships than f-f friendship, definitely, so, yeah, SGA can do men and women being friends.

Point. They can do it, and they do do it, but they don't do it equally. I mean, I love that they do the John-Rodney stuff so well, but I wouldn't be horribly opposed to more Teyla-Ronon buddy scenes too.

But friends aren't romantic, ever; there's this huge line drawn between friendship and romance.

Point to you again. I honestly, honestly cannot think of a single instance to refute this point, especially on SGA. It seemed like they were trying to skirt that line a little in season two with both Teyla and Elizabeth with John, but the romantic/UST stuff always came off rather forced to me -- but their scenes where they weren't trying to do a "Will they? Won't they?" vibe worked well. (I'm really channeling "Long Goodbye" in this example, but I know there's another instance.) It seemed though they almost dropped it in season three.

As long as you're getting sex, who cares if there's a real relationship there?

But of course :P

I'm starting to wonder if that's what really set me off about it, is that very end bit seemed to suggest that very attitude? I don't know, it was something because I'm practically a Squeeosaurus when it comes to SGA. I mean, I liked "Inquisition" for crying out loud, and just about no one liked "Inquisition".

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org